Added Matter vs LexCheck

Side-by-side comparison — pricing, features, ratings, use cases. Find which Ai Legal fits you best.

⚖️ Editor's verdict
🏆 LexCheck wins by 10 points
LexCheck is a solid choice for legal teams that need fast, repeatable contract review with a compliance focus, especially for vendor agreements and M&A
See why ↓
55/100
🔍 Independently researched · 📊 Data-driven
Added Matter
Added Matter
45/100
45 € starting
Patent attorneys and agents in small to mid-sized firms who want to speed up the drafting of patent applications without

💰 Pricing

Starting at 45 €

🔧 Features

✓ Document Automation✓ Ai Model✓ Team Collaboration✓ Mobile App✓ Deadline Tracking✓ Gdpr Compliant✓ Encryption At Rest

📋 Assessment

💪 Strengths

  • Automates repetitive drafting tasks: The core value proposition is eliminating tedious work. Users can say goodbye to manually formatting every heading, renumbering claims after edits, and pasting boilerplate sections. The AI handles these automatically, freeing attorneys to focus on substantive patent strategy. This can reduce the time to first draft by a significant margin, especially for routine filings.
  • AI-assisted language suggestions: Beyond structural automation, Added Matter uses AI to suggest claim language and descriptive text. This can help overcome writer's block or generate alternative phrasings, which is particularly useful when drafting multiple related applications. The suggestions are grounded in patent-specific vocabulary, making them more relevant than generic AI models.
  • Team collaboration and deadline tracking: On higher-tier plans, the platform supports multiple users, enabling real-time collaboration on the same draft. It also includes deadline tracking, ensuring that critical filing dates are never missed. This transforms the tool from a solo drafting aid into a workflow hub for small IP teams, improving project visibility and coordination.
  • GDPR compliance and data encryption: Legal professionals handle sensitive client information, and Added Matter addresses this by being GDPR compliant and encrypting data at rest. This is not a differentiator per se, but it meets the baseline expectations for a legal tech tool, giving firms confidence in data handling.
  • User-friendly interface: The platform is designed with simplicity in mind. New users can navigate the drafting process without a steep learning curve, and the focus on the drafting workflow—rather than a cluttered suite of features—means less distraction and faster adoption.

⚠ Watch out for

  • No free tier or trial: Potential buyers must commit to a paid plan to test the tool. This is a significant barrier, especially for solo practitioners or small firms who want to evaluate the time savings before spending money. A trial would reduce the risk of purchasing a tool that doesn't fit their workflow.
  • Lack of prior art search and analytics: The tool's scope is limited to drafting. It does not include prior art searching, which is a critical part of the patent process, nor does it offer analytics on patent portfolios. Users must maintain subscriptions to separate tools, adding to overall costs and reducing workflow efficiency.
  • No integrations with patent office filing systems: Added Matter does not provide an API or direct integrations with systems like USPTO's EFS-Web or WIPO. This means that the final application must be manually downloaded and filed, breaking the automation chain. Users cannot automate the submission process, which is a missed opportunity for end-to-end workflow automation.
  • Pricing could be opaque: While the starting price is $49/mo, details on higher-tier features and costs are not clearly accessible on the website. This can make it difficult for potential buyers to assess value for their specific team size or needs, leading to unexpected costs.

🎯 Best for

Patent attorneys and agents in small to mid-sized firms who want to speed up the drafting of patent applications without needing advanced analytics or integration.

🚫 Who should skip

Large law firms or corporate IP departments that require comprehensive patent lifecycle management, prior art search, or direct integration with patent office systems.

💰 Hidden costs

Upgrading to Enterprise tier for unlimited projects costs $399/month; no mention of add-on or overage costs for exceeding project limits on lower tiers.

📚 Learning curve

Moderate - Users familiar with patent drafting will quickly learn the interface, but new users may need a few hours to adapt to the AI-assisted workflow.

🧑‍⚖️ Verdict

Added Matter is a valuable assistant for patent attorneys and agents who want to streamline the drafting process and save time on routine tasks. It is particularly suited for those who handle high volumes of applications and are willing to accept limited scope in exchange for efficiency. However, if

View Details
LexCheck
LexCheck
55/100
28 € starting
Legal and procurement teams in mid-to-large enterprises that need fast, AI-driven contract analysis and risk assessment
★ Best

💰 Pricing

Starting at 28 €

🔧 Features

✓ Contract Analysis✓ Compliance Check✓ Ai Model✓ Api Available✓ Team Collaboration✓ Document Comparison✓ Clause Library✓ Risk Scoring✓ Gdpr Compliant✓ Soc2 Compliant✓ Encryption At Rest✓ Audit Log

📋 Assessment

💪 Strengths

  • Clause-level risk scoring: LexCheck automatically assigns risk scores to key clauses (e.g., indemnity, liability cap, termination for convenience). This is a significant time-saver for reviewers because it lets them prioritize high-risk contracts or sections. Instead of reading every line, counsel can jump to red-flag areas, drastically reducing review time. For example, a procurement team handling 50 vendor agreements a month can quickly filter out the riskiest ones and focus on those.
  • GDPR compliance checks: The platform has built-in checks for data protection compliance. It flags clauses that may conflict with GDPR, such as data transfer mechanisms, consent requirements, or processing terms. This is a critical feature for businesses dealing with EU data. It reduces the risk of non-compliance and helps legal teams stay ahead of regulatory requirements without manually scanning for data privacy provisions.
  • Enterprise plan with API access: For large legal departments, the enterprise tier offers API integration, enabling automated contract analysis to be embedded into custom workflows. This scalability is a game-changer for companies with high contract volumes (e.g., 1000+ per month). API access means contracts can be analyzed in bulk as they are uploaded to a contract lifecycle management system, and results can sync back, creating a seamless workflow.
  • Collaboration features: The enterprise plan includes team collaboration tools, allowing multiple reviewers to work on the same contract or share results. This is useful for in-house legal teams where paralegals, associates, and outside counsel may need to review different parts of a contract. Features like @mentions, shared comments, and audit trails improve oversight and accountability.
  • Fast analysis: LexCheck can analyze a contract in minutes, compared to hours of manual review. According to user reports, a standard NDA can be reviewed in under 5 minutes. For M&A due diligence, where hundreds of contracts must be reviewed in a short window, this speed is invaluable. The tool also provides a summary of key terms, which is helpful for quick decision-making.

⚠ Watch out for

  • Limited free tier: There is no free trial or freemium option, which is a significant drawback for potential buyers. You must pay $30/mo just to try it, and the starter plan only includes 10 contracts per month. This makes it impractical for testing the tool thoroughly or for small businesses with low but unpredictable contract volumes. To properly evaluate the tool's accuracy, you might need to upgrade, which is a financial commitment.
  • Contract volume cap: The starter plan's 10 contracts/month is restrictive for most growing businesses. Even a small startup negotiating vendor agreements, employment contracts, and NDAs will quickly exceed 10 contracts. Upgrading to a higher tier is expensive (enterprise is custom-priced), so a mid-sized company might end up paying a hefty sum. Competitors often offer more generous volume limits at similar price points.
  • No document automation or legal research: LexCheck is solely a review tool. It does not generate contracts, nor does it provide legal research or case law search. This means you cannot use it to draft agreements or conduct due diligence research. For firms that need an all-in-one legal platform, LexCheck is insufficient. You would need to pair it with other tools (e.g., a CLM, legal research databases), creating integration complexity.
  • Potential accuracy concerns: As with any AI tool, LexCheck's algorithm may miss nuances or misidentify clauses. While the company claims high accuracy, it is not perfect. For complex contracts involving unusual language or industry-specific terms, the AI might flag false positives or miss critical risks. This necessitates human oversight, which somewhat reduces the time-saving benefit. Users should be prepared to verify the AI's findings.
  • No on-premise deployment option: For companies with strict data security requirements (e.g., government contractors, financial institutions), the cloud-only deployment might be a deal-breaker. LexCheck does not offer on-premise or private cloud options, meaning contract data—which is often highly sensitive—must be uploaded to LexCheck's servers. This is a concern for some enterprises, especially those outside the US or EU.

🎯 Best for

Legal and procurement teams in mid-to-large enterprises that need fast, AI-driven contract analysis and risk assessment for high volumes of agreements.

🚫 Who should skip

Solo practitioners or small businesses with extremely low contract volumes, and organizations that require end-to-end legal workflow tools including drafting, research, or e-discovery.

💰 Hidden costs

API access is locked behind the Enterprise plan ($500/month), which may be a surprise if you need integration. Additional contracts beyond plan limits likely require plan upgrades or overage fees.

📚 Learning curve

Minimal — the tool uses an intuitive interface with AI-powered suggestions, though interpreting risk scores and clause significance may require some legal knowledge.

🧑‍⚖️ Verdict

LexCheck is a solid choice for legal teams that need fast, repeatable contract review with a compliance focus, especially for vendor agreements and M&A. It's not for those wanting a free trial, extensive legal research, or on-premise security. If you have high contract volume and value API integrati

View Details

📊 Use Case Suitability

Higher score = better fit. Scores from editorial review.

Use CaseAdded MatterLexCheck
Drafting initial patent applications90— The tool automates repetitive formatting and wording, helping draft patent appli
Team collaboration on patent drafts85— Professional and Enterprise tiers enable multiple team members to work on the sa
Managing patent application deadlines70— The deadline tracking feature helps keep projects on schedule, though it is basi
Automating patent document formatting and boilerplate text95— Added Matter excels at generating consistent, well-formatted patent applications
On-the-go review of patent drafts65— The mobile app allows quick reviews and minor edits, but heavy drafting is bette
Vendor Contract Review for Procurement Teams—92 LexCheck's contract analysis, risk scoring, and compliance check features allow
Mergers & Acquisitions Due Diligence—88 The document comparison and clause library enable efficient extraction and compa
Compliance Audits for Regulatory Requirements—90 Built-in compliance checking and audit log functionality help legal teams ensure

🧭 Which One Should You Pick?

Choose Added Matter if...

  • You are: Patent attorneys and agents in small to mid-sized firms who want to speed up the drafting of patent applications without
  • 👍 Automates repetitive drafting tasks like formatting, numbering, and boilerplate sections, saving sig
  • 👍 Offers team collaboration and deadline tracking on higher tiers, improving workflow for patent teams
  • 👍 GDPR compliant and encrypts data at rest, providing standard data protection for legal documents.
  • 💰 From $49/mo
  • ⚠ Trade-off: No free tier or trial, so potential buyers must commit to a paid plan to test th

Choose LexCheck if...

  • You are: Legal and procurement teams in mid-to-large enterprises that need fast, AI-driven contract analysis and risk assessment
  • 👍 Automated extraction and analysis of key contract clauses with risk scoring, reducing manual review
  • 👍 Built-in compliance checks for regulatory standards like GDPR, enhancing risk management.
  • 👍 Enterprise plan offers API access and team collaboration, making it scalable for large legal departm
  • 💰 From $30/mo
  • ⚠ Trade-off: Starter plan is limited to only 10 contracts per month, which may be restrictive

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What are the pricing tiers and what do they include?

Added Matter offers three tiers: Basic at $49/month (10 projects, document automation only), Professional at $149/month (50 projects, adds team collaboration and deadline tracking), and Enterprise at $399/month (unlimited projects, all features). There is no free tier.

Does Added Matter include prior art search or patent analytics?

No, Added Matter focuses solely on drafting automation. It does not offer prior art search, patent analytics, or legal research. You would need separate tools for those tasks.

Can I collaborate with my team on patent drafts?

Yes, team collaboration is available on the Professional and Enterprise tiers. The Basic tier is single-user only.

Is my data secure and compliant with regulations?

Added Matter encrypts data at rest and is GDPR compliant, but it is not SOC2 compliant and does not offer on-premise deployment. Data is stored in the cloud.

🔗 More Ai Legal Comparisons

🔀 Explore Alternatives

🤖

AI Compare Buddy

Experimental

Let AI analyze features, pricing, and reviews to help you decide.

📧 Save this comparison

We'll email you a link to this comparison. No spam.