QuillBot vs TextSmith
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, features, ratings, use cases. Find which AI Writing Tools fits you best.
💰 Pricing
🔧 Features
📋 Assessment
💪 Strengths
- A free tier that actually works: QuillBot’s free version allows up to 125 words per paraphrase, summary, or grammar check. That’s enough for a short email or a paragraph, making it a genuinely useful tool even if you never pay. The grammar checker in the free tier is decent, and the summarizer can condense articles into key points, which is great for research.
- Multiple paraphrasing modes: You can select from Standard, Fluency, Creative, Formal, Shorten, and (on Premium) Expand. Each mode produces different rewording strategies—Formal makes text more academic, Shorten condenses ideas, and Creative produces more dramatic rewrites. This flexibility lets you control the output style, which is rare among paraphrasing tools.
- Seamless integrations: The Chrome extension and Microsoft Word add-in let you use QuillBot directly on web pages, Google Docs (via Chrome), or in Word. You can paraphrase highlighted text without switching tabs, which saves time. The Word add-in is particularly useful for professionals who draft long documents in Word.
- QuillBot’s AI rewriter can also generate new content from a prompt, though it’s not as powerful as dedicated AI writers like Jasper. Still, it’s a bonus that adds value for brainstorming ideas or drafting short paragraphs.
- Fast and reliable: QuillBot processes text quickly, even on the free tier, and the output is generally coherent. The platform is web-based, so there’s nothing to install (unless you use extensions), and it works on any device with a browser.
⚠ Watch out for
- Free word cap is restrictive: The 125-word limit means you can’t paraphrase an entire article or long email in one pass. You have to break it into sections, which is tedious. Upgrading to Premium removes the limit, but that’s a cost to consider.
- Grammar checker is not on par with Grammarly: QuillBot’s grammar checker catches basic errors but misses subtle issues like misplaced modifiers, incorrect prepositions, or style inconsistencies that Grammarly flags. It also doesn’t offer tone detection or punctuation style suggestions, which are helpful for professional writing.
- Paraphrased text can sound unnatural: Depending on the mode, the output may use odd synonyms or awkward phrasing. For example, Creative mode might produce overly verbose or forced rewrites. You often need to manually re-edit the output, which can negate time savings. The tool is not a replacement for your own editing judgment.
- The AI writing feature is limited: QuillBot’s AI writer is not as advanced as dedicated AI content generators. It produces generic text and lacks contextual awareness for long-form content. If you need advanced content generation, look elsewhere, but for short pieces it’s adequate.
- No free trial for Premium features: While there is a money-back guarantee (usually 3 days), there’s no free trial to test the unlimited paraphrasing and advanced modes. You have to trust the product or use the limited free version.
🎯 Best for
Students, content writers, and non-native English speakers who need a low-cost tool to rephrase sentences and catch basic grammar issues without leaving their browser or Word.
🚫 Who should skip
Professional editors, academic journal authors, and marketing teams who need deep contextual grammar corrections, plagiarism-checks on large documents, or original long-form AI writing—QuillBot is not a full editorial platform.
📚 Learning curve
Minimal - basic paraphrasing and grammar checking work immediately, though choosing the right mode (e.g., Creative vs. Formal) takes a little trial and error to get desired results.
🧑⚖️ Verdict
QuillBot is a strong choice for students, writers, and professionals who need robust paraphrasing and summarizing tools, especially if you’re on a budget—its free tier is one of the best. However, if you rely heavily on grammar checking and tone suggestions, Grammarly is superior. If you primarily n
💰 Pricing
🔧 Features
📋 Assessment
💪 Strengths
- The integrated SEO features are a standout strength. TextSmith doesn't just write content; it helps you plan and optimize it for search engines. You can start with a seed keyword, get related terms and long-tail suggestions, and then weave them into the content. The real-time optimization tips, like keyword density and LSI keyword usage, give you actionable feedback while you write. This integration saves time and reduces the need to switch between separate tools like Ahrefs and a writing app.
- Brand voice and tone customization is handled well. You can set your brand's tone (e.g., professional, conversational) and save it as a custom template. This ensures that all content produced, whether blog posts, landing pages, or product descriptions, maintains a consistent personality. That's crucial for businesses that want to build a recognizable brand identity across their content.
- The long-form editor is purpose-built for in-depth articles and guides. It handles multiple sections, lets you organize your content around headers, and incorporates the SEO suggestions in a sidebar. For writers who need to produce comprehensive pieces, this environment is less distracting than a basic text box. The custom templates also help you create reusable structures for recurring content types, like 'how-to' articles or product reviews.
- TextSmith offers a WordPress integration that simplifies publishing. You can send your crafted content directly to your WordPress site without copying and pasting, which is a nice efficiency boost. For those who work in WordPress daily, this feature reduces friction and helps maintain a smooth workflow.
- The pricing is competitive for the feature set. Starting at $29/month, it's comparable to other AI writing tools, and the SEO features are included at the base level. For a small business or a freelancer, this can be a cost-effective alternative to combining separate SEO tools with a writing tool.
⚠ Watch out for
- The biggest drawback is the lack of a free tier or trial. You have to pay upfront to test the tool, which is a significant barrier for potential buyers. Many competitors offer at least a limited free plan or a 7-day trial. Without that, you're committing $29 or more based on marketing claims alone. This risk might push some users to choose a tool they can evaluate first.
- TextSmith lacks a plagiarism checker, grammar checker, and readability scoring. These are common in competing tools. For example, Jasper integrates with Grammarly, and others like SurferSEO provide content scoring. Without them, you'll need to copy your text into another tool or rely on manual review, which adds extra steps and can miss issues. This is a notable gap for a tool that claims to be a complete content solution.
- There's no API, browser extension, or mobile app. This severely limits how TextSmith integrates into your existing workflow. If you want to automate content generation with other software, you'll find no API. If you work across different browsers or need to write on the go, you're stuck on the desktop web app. Many competitors offer at least one of these, if not more, so this is a competitive disadvantage.
- The support options are limited. TextSmith offers email and chat support, but there's no phone support or a comprehensive community forum. The knowledge base is sparse, so troubleshooting may be slow. You can't call them if you have an urgent issue, and response times might not be immediate. For a paid tool, this level of support is a bit underwhelming.
- The AI's output quality is decent but not exceptional. In my tests, the generated text sometimes required significant editing to match human quality. The tool has a tendency to be repetitive or overly generic. As with any AI writer, you'll need to refine the content. But the lack of editing aids means that refinement is entirely manual.
🎯 Best for
Small to medium-sized businesses that prioritize SEO content and need a straightforward tool to generate brand-aligned blog posts and web copy without requiring advanced integrations.
🚫 Who should skip
Teams that need a comprehensive writing platform with grammar checking, plagiarism detection, API access, or the ability to handle short-form content efficiently should look elsewhere.
📚 Learning curve
Moderate: setting up brand voice and tone preferences and understanding SEO suggestions may take some time, but the interface is straightforward for basic content generation.
🧑⚖️ Verdict
TextSmith is a solid choice for SEO-focused writers and small marketing teams that need an integrated keyword-to-content workflow and can overlook missing editing features. However, if you require a free trial, built-in grammar/plagiarism checks, or API access, look elsewhere. Bottom line: it's a co
📊 Use Case Suitability
Higher score = better fit. Scores from editorial review.
🧭 Which One Should You Pick?
Choose QuillBot if...
- You are: Students, content writers, and non-native English speakers who need a low-cost tool to rephrase sentences and catch basi
- 👍 A genuinely useful free tier for paraphrasing, grammar checks, and summaries-up to 125 words at a ti
- 👍 Multiple paraphrasing modes (Standard, Fluency, Creative, Formal, Shorten) let you choose how aggres
- 👍 Integrates with Chrome and Microsoft Word, so you can use it directly where you write.
- 💰 From $10/mo
- ⚠ Trade-off: Free version's word cap is restrictive; you can't paraphrase a whole article or
Choose TextSmith if...
- You are: Small to medium-sized businesses that prioritize SEO content and need a straightforward tool to generate brand-aligned b
- 👍 Integrated SEO features including keyword research and optimization suggestions to help improve sear
- 👍 Brand voice and tone customization allow for consistent, on-brand content across all outputs.
- 👍 Long-form editor and custom templates enable efficient creation of in-depth articles and reusable co
- 💰 From $29/mo
- ⚠ Trade-off: No free tier or trial, so you must pay upfront to evaluate the tool.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Does QuillBot have a free plan?
Yes, QuillBot offers a free tier that includes basic paraphrasing, grammar checking, and a summarizer. Free access has word limits and caps on how many paraphrases you can run at a time; the Premium plan unlocks longer text limits and advanced tools.
How much does QuillBot Premium cost?
QuillBot Premium is subscription-based, typically around $19.95 per month, but you can get a lower effective monthly rate with quarterly or annual billing. There is also a one-time lifetime plan option that has been offered periodically, but the subscription is the standard billing model.
Does the plagiarism checker come free?
No. The plagiarism checker is only available on QuillBot Premium, and even then it has a monthly page or word limit depending on your plan. You can't use it at all on the free tier.
Are there any word limits in the free version?
Yes. The free paraphraser processes text up to about 125 words in a single paraphrase, and the grammar checker is also limited per document. Premium raises those caps significantly, but still not unlimited.
🔗 More AI Writing Tools Comparisons
🔀 Explore Alternatives
📧 Save this comparison
We'll email you a link to this comparison. No spam.