Make (Integromat) vs n8n
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, features, ratings, use cases. Find which Workflow Automation fits you best.
💰 Pricing
📋 Assessment
💪 Strengths
- Visual scenario builder shows the entire data flow, making complex logic easier to understand and debug.
- Built-in data transformation functions (regex, math, array mapping) eliminate the need for custom scripts in many cases.
- Flexible routing with filters, switch statements, and iterators lets you build workflows that adapt to different data inputs.
- Robust HTTP request module covers virtually any REST API, which is a big advantage over simpler automation tools.
- Offers a free tier and a range of paid plans, making it accessible for both small and large teams.
⚠ Watch out for
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier or IFTTT, especially if you're not familiar with concepts like modules and data structures.
- The visual editor can become cluttered and slow when you build very large scenarios with dozens of modules.
- No native support for some popular niche apps; you'll need to rely on custom API calls or third-party connectors.
- Operation limits can be consumed quickly if you're polling APIs frequently or processing large payloads.
- Real-time triggers are not always truly real-time; some are polling-based, which can delay your automations.
🎯 Best for
Teams and power users who need powerful, multi-step workflows with custom logic, and are willing to invest time in learning Make's visual builder.
🚫 Who should skip
Casual users who only need simple 2-step automations and want the quickest, most intuitive setup — they'll find Make overkill.
📚 Learning curve
Moderate to Steep — You'll need to understand the visual canvas, modules, and operation counting, but the in-app tutorials and community help.
🧑⚖️ Verdict
Make is ideal for users who need powerful, flexible automation and are willing to invest time in learning a visual but c
💰 Pricing
📋 Assessment
💪 Strengths
- Truly open-source with no per-workflow or per-task pricing when self-hosted; the Community Edition is genuinely usable for production workflows.
- 400+ integrations and a flexible HTTP Request node mean you can connect to nearly any public or private API.
- Code nodes support JavaScript and Python, so you can handle complex data transformations, custom logic, and SDK calls without leaving the platform.
- Fair-code license allows you to build and sell commercial workflows under certain conditions, which is more permissive than many alternatives.
- Active community with 50K+ GitHub stars, extensive docs, and thousands of ready-made workflow templates.
⚠ Watch out for
- The visual editor can become cluttered and hard to navigate when building large or deeply nested workflows.
- Debugging is less beginner-friendly than Zapier or Make; you often need to inspect JSON data flow and understand node output structures.
- Self-hosted setups require you to manage Node.js, databases, upgrades, and monitoring — not ideal if you just want a click-and-connect tool.
- Some nodes have gaps or quirks: not every integration supports all actions, and community nodes can be less reliable than official ones.
- Enterprise features like SSO, LDAP, and advanced RBAC are only available in paid scale tiers, which can be costly for larger organizations.
🎯 Best for
Developers, IT teams, and technical operations people who want a self-hostable, code-friendly workflow automation platform with deep customization and no per-task fees.
🚫 Who should skip
Non-technical small business owners or marketing users who need instant templates, a friendlier visual builder, and no server maintenance — n8n will feel more technical than tools like Zapier or Make.
📚 Learning curve
Moderate — the visual builder is approachable for simple workflows, but you need to understand JSON data flow, node error behavior, and basic JavaScript/Python to unlock its full power.
🧑⚖️ Verdict
n8n is an excellent choice for technical users and businesses that need flexible, cost-effective automation without per-
📊 Use Case Suitability
Higher score = better fit. Scores from editorial review.
🧭 Which One Should You Pick?
Choose Make (Integromat) if...
- You are: Teams and power users who need powerful, multi-step workflows with custom logic, and are willing to invest time in learn
- 👍 Visual scenario builder shows the entire data flow, making complex logic easier to understand and de
- 👍 Built-in data transformation functions (regex, math, array mapping) eliminate the need for custom sc
- 👍 Flexible routing with filters, switch statements, and iterators lets you build workflows that adapt
- 💰 From $9/mo
- ⚠ Trade-off: Steeper learning curve than Zapier or IFTTT, especially if you're not familiar w
Choose n8n if...
- You are: Developers, IT teams, and technical operations people who want a self-hostable, code-friendly workflow automation platfo
- 👍 Truly open-source with no per-workflow or per-task pricing when self-hosted; the Community Edition i
- 👍 400+ integrations and a flexible HTTP Request node mean you can connect to nearly any public or priv
- 👍 Code nodes support JavaScript and Python, so you can handle complex data transformations, custom log
- 💰 From $20/mo
- ⚠ Trade-off: The visual editor can become cluttered and hard to navigate when building large
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
How is Make different from Zapier?
Make offers a visual canvas where you can see the entire flow of data between apps, with more powerful tools for branching, filtering, and data transformations. It's better suited for complex, multi-step workflows, while Zapier is simpler to get started with for basic integrations.
Does Make have a free plan?
Yes, Make has a free plan that includes a certain number of operations per month, but it comes with limits on data transfer and the number of active scenarios. Paid plans scale based on the number of operations you need, with higher tiers unlocking additional features like more frequent scheduling and larger data volumes.
What counts as an operation in Make?
An operation is counted every time a module in your scenario runs, such as an API request to an app, a filter, or a data transformation step. Complex scenarios with many modules and frequent runs can quickly consume your operation quota, so it's important to monitor usage.
Can I connect to all the apps I use at work?
Make has hundreds of pre-built app modules for common tools like Google Sheets, Slack, Salesforce, and Mailchimp, plus a robust HTTP module for connecting to any REST API. If a direct integration isn't available, you can often build a custom API call using webhooks or HTTP requests.
🔗 More Workflow Automation Comparisons
🔀 Explore Alternatives
📧 Save this comparison
We'll email you a link to this comparison. No spam.