Close vs The Point Co.

Side-by-side comparison — pricing, features, ratings, use cases. Find which Marketing fits you best.

⚖️ Editor's verdict
🏆 Close wins by 55 points
Close is an excellent choice for SMB sales teams that rely on phone calls and want to streamline outbound processes with integrated communication, automation, and coaching
See why ↓
76/100
🔍 Independently researched · 📊 Data-driven · ⭐ Ratings from G2 (real user reviews)
Close
Close
76/100
Free tier
Close is best for SMB sales teams that rely on high-volume phone outreach and need a simple, all-in-one CRM with built-i
★ Best

💰 Pricing

🆓 Free tier available

🔧 Features

✓ Automation✓ Crm

📋 Assessment

💪 Strengths

  • Native calling and power dialer: Close integrates a full phone system directly into the CRM. Reps can make calls with one click, and the power dialer automatically loads the next number from a saved list, significantly increasing call volume. The built-in caller ID, call recording, and voicemail dropdown (with pre-recorded messages) streamline the entire process. This is a huge time-saver for outbound teams that live on the phone.
  • Custom automation builder: The visual workflow automation lets you create multi-step sequences without coding. For example, you can set up a rule that triggers an email and SMS follow-up when a lead status changes to 'contacted'. It also supports conditionals and delays. This reduces repetitive manual tasks and ensures consistent follow-up, which is crucial for lead conversion.
  • Coaching and training features: Close allows managers to listen to live calls, review recordings, and leave time-stamped comments directly on the conversation timeline. The 'coaching moments' feature tracks these interactions, helping managers monitor rep improvement over time. This is a powerful tool for sales enablement, and it's rarely found at this price point.
  • Custom reporting and funnels: You can build tailored reports with custom widgets, such as call volume, conversion rates, and revenue by source. Funnel reports visualize the stages of your pipeline, helping identify bottlenecks. This gives managers actionable insights without needing a separate BI tool.
  • Email and SMS tracking with templates: All email and SMS communications are logged automatically, with open and click tracking. You can create reusable templates for email and SMS, and even use the ' email sequence' feature to drip campaigns. This ensures that team communication is transparent and consistent.

⚠ Watch out for

  • Learning curve: The interface packs a lot of functionality, and it might take new users a week or more to become productive. Especially if you're coming from a simpler tool, the sheer number of options in the UI can be overwhelming. The automation builder also requires a bit of logic-thinking.
  • Limited reporting customization for advanced analytics: While custom reports are available, they don't match the depth of tools like Tableau or even built-in analytics in Salesforces. For instance, you can't create fully custom calculated fields or query the database directly. Teams with very complex reporting needs might outgrow it.
  • Email integration is limited: Close works with Gmail and Outlook but has limited native integration with other email providers. Also, the email sync is two-way but can occasionally lag or miss a message. For teams that use a different email client, this can be a hassle.
  • No free tier for larger teams: The free plan only supports up to 2 users, and it's quite limited (only basic features). For a growing SMB, the cost can add up quickly, especially when you add on SMS credits and additional users. Each user starts at $49/month (annual billing), which is pricier than some competitors like Pipedrive.
  • Mobile app is weaker: The mobile app is functional for viewing and making calls, but it lacks some of the features of the desktop version, such as advanced automation and report building. For teams that need to operate heavily on mobile, this might be a drawback.

🎯 Best for

Close is best for SMB sales teams that rely on high-volume phone outreach and need a simple, all-in-one CRM with built-in calling and automation.

🚫 Who should skip

Skip Close if you're looking for a free CRM, an enterprise-level reporting solution, or a primarily email-only sales workflow without heavy phone usage.

💰 Hidden costs

Per-minute calling charges, higher-tier plan costs for advanced automation and custom fields, and potential add-on fees for extra data imports, API access, or premium support. There is no true free plan—only a trial.

📚 Learning curve

Moderate. Setup is straightforward for calling and pipelines, but configuring workflows, custom fields, and the power dialer takes time and practice.

🧑‍⚖️ Verdict

Close is an excellent choice for SMB sales teams that rely on phone calls and want to streamline outbound processes with integrated communication, automation, and coaching. It's not for those seeking a simple contact manager or for teams that primarily use email-only workflows. If you're serious abo

View Details
The Point Co.
The Point Co.
21/100
—
B2B companies that want to scale their client base through strategic partnerships without paying any upfront business de

💰 Pricing

Pricing not publicly available

📋 Assessment

💪 Strengths

  • Performance-Based Pricing: The most compelling aspect is the 5% fee on first-year contract value. This minimizes upfront costs and aligns The Point Co.'s success with your own. For cash-strapped startups, this reduces the financial barrier to business development services and ensures that you only pay for actual results.
  • Partnership Network: The Point Co. leverages a network of strategic partners to source leads. This expands your reach beyond your own marketing efforts, tapping into relationships and markets you might not otherwise access. It's particularly beneficial for companies looking to enter new verticals or geographies.
  • Structured Partnership Management: The use of PartnerStack provides a structured system for tracking referrals, contracts, and commissions. This transparency ensures that you can monitor the performance of the service and verify the accuracy of commissions, adding a layer of trust and accountability.
  • Focus on High-Value Contracts: By tying fees to first-year contract value, The Point Co. is incentivized to prioritize quality leads over quantity. This can result in more substantial, long-term clients rather than short-term, low-value transactions, potentially increasing the overall ROI of the service.
  • Low Risk for Trial: Because there's no upfront fee, engaging The Point Co. is essentially a low-risk trial. If they fail to deliver a client, you've lost nothing but the time spent in discussions. This makes it easier to test the service and see if it fits your business model.

⚠ Watch out for

  • Limited Transparency and Information: The Point Co. has a very limited online footprint, with few reviews and sparse details about its process, success rates, and target industries. This lack of transparency makes it difficult for potential clients to gauge the service's effectiveness and credibility, posing a risk for those considering engagement.
  • Potential Bias Towards Large Contracts: The 5% commission on first-year contract value means The Point Co. is more motivated to pursue larger deals. This could disadvantage businesses offering lower-priced products or services, as the return for the company may not justify the same level of effort, leading to fewer high-quality leads for those clients.
  • No Guarantee of Results: While the pricing model reduces financial risk, it also means that if The Point Co. fails to secure any clients, you gain nothing. The service's effectiveness is heavily dependent on their network and execution capabilities, which are untested in the public eye due to the lack of case studies or client testimonials.
  • Standard Partnership Approach: The business development method is not innovative; it's a standard partnership-based referral model. Companies with already robust referral networks may find little added value. The lack of a proprietary technology or unique process could limit its differentiation from other business development agencies.

🎯 Best for

B2B companies that want to scale their client base through strategic partnerships without paying any upfront business development costs and are comfortable with a results-based fee.

🚫 Who should skip

Companies that need a fully self-serve lead generation platform, require enterprise-grade CRM integrations, or are looking for a fixed-cost predictable marketing budget instead of a percentage-based success fee.

💰 Hidden costs

There are no upfront fees, but the 5% fee on first-year contract value may be higher than expected for large contracts. Also, your internal team will likely spend time on partnership calls, alignment, and follow-ups, which is not billed by The Point Co. but is a real time cost.

📚 Learning curve

Minimal — this is a managed service, so the main effort is aligning your goals and sales process with The Point Co. and PartnerStack, which is straightforward for most B2B teams.

🧑‍⚖️ Verdict

The Point Co. is a viable option for B2B companies seeking to expand their client base with minimal upfront risk, particularly those with high-value contracts. Its performance-based model is its main strength, but the lack of verifiable reviews and a standard partnership approach may deter businesse

View Details

📊 Use Case Suitability

Higher score = better fit. Scores from editorial review.

Use CaseCloseThe Point Co.
High-volume cold calling for SMB sales teams95— Close's power dialer and native calling are purpose-built for reps making dozens
Managing multi-stage B2B sales pipelines88— Customizable pipelines, drag-and-drop deal stages, and activity tracking give sa
Automated email and SMS follow-up sequences82— Workflow automation can trigger personalized follow-ups based on call outcomes,
Sales coaching and performance monitoring75— Call recording, call coaching tools, and activity dashboards let managers review
Affiliate/partner program management via PartnerStack55— Close integrates with PartnerStack, but it is not an affiliate platform itself.
B2B Client Acquisition via Partnerships—95 The Point Co. is explicitly designed to secure new clients through strategic par
Scaling Without Upfront Marketing Spend—90 Its 5% performance-based fee eliminates upfront costs, ideal for companies that
Entering New Markets or Verticals—75 Strategic partnerships may open doors to new networks, but success depends on wh

🧭 Which One Should You Pick?

Choose Close if...

  • You are: Close is best for SMB sales teams that rely on high-volume phone outreach and need a simple, all-in-one CRM with built-i
  • 👍 Native calling with power dialer directly in the CRM, so no third-party telephony setup is needed.
  • 👍 Strong activity logging: emails, calls, and SMS are automatically tracked against the contact or lea
  • 👍 Flexible workflows for automating repetitive tasks like follow-up reminders and data enrichment.
  • 💰 Free tier available
  • ⚠ Trade-off: No permanent free tier; the trial period is only 14 days, which can be short for

Choose The Point Co. if...

  • You are: B2B companies that want to scale their client base through strategic partnerships without paying any upfront business de
  • 👍 Completely free to start, with payment only on successful client acquisition at a transparent 5% of
  • 👍 Low-risk model reduces the financial downside typically associated with business development agencie
  • 👍 Leverages strategic partnerships, which can open doors to warmer introductions and higher conversion
  • ⚠ Trade-off: The 5% fee on first-year contract value can be substantial for large enterprise

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Is Close really free?

No. Close does not offer a permanent free plan; the listed 'Free' refers to a 14-day free trial. Paid plans start after the trial, with pricing based on features and team size.

Can I migrate data from another CRM into Close?

Yes, Close provides built-in CSV import and offers migration assistance from popular CRMs like HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive. Some historical data (like email threading) may need cleanup depending on the source.

🔗 More Marketing Comparisons

🔀 Explore Alternatives

🤖

AI Compare Buddy

Experimental

Let AI analyze features, pricing, and reviews to help you decide.

📧 Save this comparison

We'll email you a link to this comparison. No spam.