Make (Integromat) vs Workato

Side-by-side comparison — pricing, features, ratings, use cases. Find which Workflow Automation fits you best.

⚖️ Editor's verdict
🏆 Make (Integromat) wins by 27 points
Make is ideal for users who need powerful, flexible automation and are willing to invest time in learning a visual but c
See why ↓
53/100
🔍 Independently researched · 📊 Data-driven
Make (Integromat)
Make (Integromat)
53/100
207 Kč starting
Teams and power users who need powerful, multi-step workflows with custom logic, and are willing to invest time in learn
★ Best

💰 Pricing

Starting at 207 Kč

📋 Assessment

💪 Strengths

  • Visual scenario builder shows the entire data flow, making complex logic easier to understand and debug.
  • Built-in data transformation functions (regex, math, array mapping) eliminate the need for custom scripts in many cases.
  • Flexible routing with filters, switch statements, and iterators lets you build workflows that adapt to different data inputs.
  • Robust HTTP request module covers virtually any REST API, which is a big advantage over simpler automation tools.
  • Offers a free tier and a range of paid plans, making it accessible for both small and large teams.

⚠ Watch out for

  • Steeper learning curve than Zapier or IFTTT, especially if you're not familiar with concepts like modules and data structures.
  • The visual editor can become cluttered and slow when you build very large scenarios with dozens of modules.
  • No native support for some popular niche apps; you'll need to rely on custom API calls or third-party connectors.
  • Operation limits can be consumed quickly if you're polling APIs frequently or processing large payloads.
  • Real-time triggers are not always truly real-time; some are polling-based, which can delay your automations.

🎯 Best for

Teams and power users who need powerful, multi-step workflows with custom logic, and are willing to invest time in learning Make's visual builder.

🚫 Who should skip

Casual users who only need simple 2-step automations and want the quickest, most intuitive setup — they'll find Make overkill.

💰 Hidden costs

Operation overages can add up on higher-volume plans; some apps require a premium subscription within Make; complex scenarios may require frequent data transfers, increasing operation usage.

📚 Learning curve

Moderate to Steep — You'll need to understand the visual canvas, modules, and operation counting, but the in-app tutorials and community help.

🧑‍⚖️ Verdict

Make is ideal for users who need powerful, flexible automation and are willing to invest time in learning a visual but c

View Details
Workato
Workato
26/100
—
Mid-to-large enterprises that need complex, high-volume automation across multiple business systems with strict governan

💰 Pricing

Pricing not publicly available

📋 Assessment

💪 Strengths

  • Over 1,000 pre-built connectors covering major enterprise systems, with a universal API connector for custom integrations.
  • AI-powered recipe builder that suggests workflow steps, reducing manual design time for complex integrations.
  • Strong governance and security features including role-based access control, audit logs, and compliance certifications (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR).
  • Real-time processing and high scalability, suitable for high-volume business-critical automation.
  • Visual mapping and monitoring tools that make it easier to debug and maintain complicated workflows.

⚠ Watch out for

  • Very expensive — pricing is enterprise-tier and often requires a sales quote; not budget-friendly for small teams.
  • Steep learning curve, especially for users without integration or API experience.
  • Recipe builder can feel overwhelming for simple tasks due to the sheer number of options and configurations.
  • Usage-based pricing can lead to unpredictable costs if task volumes spike.
  • Some standard connectors lack advanced features and may require custom API calls or workarounds.

🎯 Best for

Mid-to-large enterprises that need complex, high-volume automation across multiple business systems with strict governance, security, and compliance requirements.

🚫 Who should skip

Small businesses, startups, or individuals looking for quick, cheap, low-code automation — services like Zapier or Make are more accessible and affordable for those needs.

💰 Hidden costs

Beyond the base subscription, Workato may charge extra for usage overages, additional connectors, dedicated support, premium training, and adding users. Moving from a trial to production often requires a significant implementation or consulting spend as well.

📚 Learning curve

Steep — Workato is powerful but requires time to learn its recipe builder, data mapping, and troubleshooting concepts, especially for non-technical users.

🧑‍⚖️ Verdict

Workato is an excellent choice for large enterprises that need a scalable, secure, and feature-rich integration platform

View Details

📊 Use Case Suitability

Higher score = better fit. Scores from editorial review.

Use CaseMake (IntegromaWorkato
Automating multi-step e-commerce operations95— Make's router and iterator modules let you handle complex order processing, inve
Data synchronization between SaaS apps90— Extensive app integrations and data-mapping capabilities make it easy to keep sy
Lead capture and CRM enrichment92— You can trigger on new leads, enrich them with external data sources, and route
Internal approval workflows with human-in-the-loop85— Make's waiting and custom webhook modules allow you to pause scenarios until som
Simple one-step notification automations45— For simple 'when this happens, do that' tasks, Zapier or IFTTT are faster to set
Enterprise ETL and Data Integration—95 Workato excels at moving and synchronizing large volumes of data across database
Sales and Marketing Orchestration—88 Deep connectors for Salesforce, Marketo, HubSpot, and other marketing tools make
HR and Finance Workflow Automation—90 Workato works well for automating employee onboarding, payroll, invoice processi

🧭 Which One Should You Pick?

Choose Make (Integromat) if...

  • You are: Teams and power users who need powerful, multi-step workflows with custom logic, and are willing to invest time in learn
  • 👍 Visual scenario builder shows the entire data flow, making complex logic easier to understand and de
  • 👍 Built-in data transformation functions (regex, math, array mapping) eliminate the need for custom sc
  • 👍 Flexible routing with filters, switch statements, and iterators lets you build workflows that adapt
  • 💰 From $9/mo
  • ⚠ Trade-off: Steeper learning curve than Zapier or IFTTT, especially if you're not familiar w

Choose Workato if...

  • You are: Mid-to-large enterprises that need complex, high-volume automation across multiple business systems with strict governan
  • 👍 Over 1,000 pre-built connectors covering major enterprise systems, with a universal API connector fo
  • 👍 AI-powered recipe builder that suggests workflow steps, reducing manual design time for complex inte
  • 👍 Strong governance and security features including role-based access control, audit logs, and complia
  • ⚠ Trade-off: Very expensive — pricing is enterprise-tier and often requires a sales quote; no

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

How is Make different from Zapier?

Make offers a visual canvas where you can see the entire flow of data between apps, with more powerful tools for branching, filtering, and data transformations. It's better suited for complex, multi-step workflows, while Zapier is simpler to get started with for basic integrations.

Does Make have a free plan?

Yes, Make has a free plan that includes a certain number of operations per month, but it comes with limits on data transfer and the number of active scenarios. Paid plans scale based on the number of operations you need, with higher tiers unlocking additional features like more frequent scheduling and larger data volumes.

What counts as an operation in Make?

An operation is counted every time a module in your scenario runs, such as an API request to an app, a filter, or a data transformation step. Complex scenarios with many modules and frequent runs can quickly consume your operation quota, so it's important to monitor usage.

Can I connect to all the apps I use at work?

Make has hundreds of pre-built app modules for common tools like Google Sheets, Slack, Salesforce, and Mailchimp, plus a robust HTTP module for connecting to any REST API. If a direct integration isn't available, you can often build a custom API call using webhooks or HTTP requests.

🔗 More Workflow Automation Comparisons

🔀 Explore Alternatives

🤖

AI Compare Buddy

Experimental

Let AI analyze features, pricing, and reviews to help you decide.

📧 Save this comparison

We'll email you a link to this comparison. No spam.