6 alternatives to PlanetScale in Database, ranked by our editorial score. Compare pricing, free tiers, and best-fit guidance side by side.
| Tool | Score | Starting Price | Free Tier | Best For | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supabase | 79 | 23 €/mo | Developers and early-stage startups who want an integrated PostgreSQL backend wi | Compare vs PlanetScale → | |
| MongoDB Atlas | 70 | Free | ✓ | Developers and startups building web and mobile applications that need a flexibl | Compare vs PlanetScale → |
| Airtable | 57 | 18 €/mo | Non-technical teams and small/medium businesses that need a flexible, collaborat | Compare vs PlanetScale → | |
| Databricks | 48 | Free | ✓ | Data teams wanting unified analytics + AI platform | Compare vs PlanetScale → |
| Snowflake | 42 | — | Data teams wanting cloud-native data warehousing | Compare vs PlanetScale → | |
| Neon Serverless Postgres | 33 | Free | ✓ | Developers and teams who want an effortless, serverless Postgres that supports m | Compare vs PlanetScale → |
Best for: Developers and early-stage startups who want an integrated PostgreSQL backend wi · Costs 4 €/mo less than PlanetScale
⚖️ PlanetScale vs Supabase →Best for: Developers and startups building web and mobile applications that need a flexibl · Has a free tier where the original does not
⚖️ PlanetScale vs MongoDB Atlas →Best for: Non-technical teams and small/medium businesses that need a flexible, collaborat · Costs 8 €/mo less than PlanetScale
⚖️ PlanetScale vs Airtable →Best for: Data teams wanting unified analytics + AI platform · Has a free tier where the original does not
⚖️ PlanetScale vs Databricks →PlanetScale uses a tiered subscription with usage-based add-ons (storage, row reads, data transfer). It previously had a free Hobby tier and paid plans starting around $39/month, but after GitHub acquired PlanetScale, pricing may have changed — check planetscale.com for current plans.
PlanetScale's distributed nature means certain MySQL features — like some multi-table joins with non-sharded keys, or features dependent on session-level variables — can be limited. Forconsistent raw MySQL power, a traditional RDS may be more suitable.