Close vs Crazy Egg

Side-by-side comparison — pricing, features, ratings, use cases. Find which Marketing fits you best.

⚖️ Editor's verdict
🏆 Close wins by 19 points
Close is an excellent choice for SMB sales teams that rely on phone calls and want to streamline outbound processes with integrated communication, automation, and coaching
See why ↓
76/100
🔍 Independently researched · 📊 Data-driven · ⭐ Ratings from G2 (real user reviews)
Close
Close
76/100
Free tier
Close is best for SMB sales teams that rely on high-volume phone outreach and need a simple, all-in-one CRM with built-i
★ Best

💰 Pricing

🆓 Free tier available

🔧 Features

✓ Automation✓ Crm

📋 Assessment

💪 Strengths

  • Native calling and power dialer: Close integrates a full phone system directly into the CRM. Reps can make calls with one click, and the power dialer automatically loads the next number from a saved list, significantly increasing call volume. The built-in caller ID, call recording, and voicemail dropdown (with pre-recorded messages) streamline the entire process. This is a huge time-saver for outbound teams that live on the phone.
  • Custom automation builder: The visual workflow automation lets you create multi-step sequences without coding. For example, you can set up a rule that triggers an email and SMS follow-up when a lead status changes to 'contacted'. It also supports conditionals and delays. This reduces repetitive manual tasks and ensures consistent follow-up, which is crucial for lead conversion.
  • Coaching and training features: Close allows managers to listen to live calls, review recordings, and leave time-stamped comments directly on the conversation timeline. The 'coaching moments' feature tracks these interactions, helping managers monitor rep improvement over time. This is a powerful tool for sales enablement, and it's rarely found at this price point.
  • Custom reporting and funnels: You can build tailored reports with custom widgets, such as call volume, conversion rates, and revenue by source. Funnel reports visualize the stages of your pipeline, helping identify bottlenecks. This gives managers actionable insights without needing a separate BI tool.
  • Email and SMS tracking with templates: All email and SMS communications are logged automatically, with open and click tracking. You can create reusable templates for email and SMS, and even use the ' email sequence' feature to drip campaigns. This ensures that team communication is transparent and consistent.

⚠ Watch out for

  • Learning curve: The interface packs a lot of functionality, and it might take new users a week or more to become productive. Especially if you're coming from a simpler tool, the sheer number of options in the UI can be overwhelming. The automation builder also requires a bit of logic-thinking.
  • Limited reporting customization for advanced analytics: While custom reports are available, they don't match the depth of tools like Tableau or even built-in analytics in Salesforces. For instance, you can't create fully custom calculated fields or query the database directly. Teams with very complex reporting needs might outgrow it.
  • Email integration is limited: Close works with Gmail and Outlook but has limited native integration with other email providers. Also, the email sync is two-way but can occasionally lag or miss a message. For teams that use a different email client, this can be a hassle.
  • No free tier for larger teams: The free plan only supports up to 2 users, and it's quite limited (only basic features). For a growing SMB, the cost can add up quickly, especially when you add on SMS credits and additional users. Each user starts at $49/month (annual billing), which is pricier than some competitors like Pipedrive.
  • Mobile app is weaker: The mobile app is functional for viewing and making calls, but it lacks some of the features of the desktop version, such as advanced automation and report building. For teams that need to operate heavily on mobile, this might be a drawback.

🎯 Best for

Close is best for SMB sales teams that rely on high-volume phone outreach and need a simple, all-in-one CRM with built-in calling and automation.

🚫 Who should skip

Skip Close if you're looking for a free CRM, an enterprise-level reporting solution, or a primarily email-only sales workflow without heavy phone usage.

💰 Hidden costs

Per-minute calling charges, higher-tier plan costs for advanced automation and custom fields, and potential add-on fees for extra data imports, API access, or premium support. There is no true free plan—only a trial.

📚 Learning curve

Moderate. Setup is straightforward for calling and pipelines, but configuring workflows, custom fields, and the power dialer takes time and practice.

🧑‍⚖️ Verdict

Close is an excellent choice for SMB sales teams that rely on phone calls and want to streamline outbound processes with integrated communication, automation, and coaching. It's not for those seeking a simple contact manager or for teams that primarily use email-only workflows. If you're serious abo

View Details
Crazy Egg
Crazy Egg
57/100
$24 starting
Marketers and small product teams who want an affordable, easy-to-use visual analytics tool to improve landing page conv

💰 Pricing

Starting at $24

🔧 Features

✓ Analytics

📋 Assessment

💪 Strengths

  • Heatmaps and scrollmaps are the core strength. They are visually clear, load quickly, and allow you to see exactly where users stop on a page. This helps you decide whether to move critical content above the fold, reposition CTAs, or reduce page length. The ability to toggle between click, move, and scroll maps gives a comprehensive view without needing to export data.
  • The Confetti report is unique and highly actionable. It color-codes every click by traffic source (organic, paid, social, referral), so you can quickly see if visitors from social behave differently than those from search. This insight is critical for channel-specific optimization — e.g., you might discover that social traffic clicks on images but not links, prompting a different CTA style.
  • Session recordings are reliable and useful for troubleshooting. They capture actual user sessions with filters for duration, pages visited, and actions, letting you spot UX issues like failed form submissions, broken links, or confusing navigation. Recording quality is good, and playback is smooth, which helps teams quickly identify pain points.
  • The Overlay report ties click data directly to page elements. It numbers each clickable element and shows the percentage of clicks, making it easy to see what users interact with most. This is invaluable for A/B test planning — you can focus on high-click elements for optimization.
  • The A/B testing feature, while not as advanced as dedicated platforms like Optimizely, is integrated and simple. You can run experiments on headlines, CTAs, and images with minimal setup, and the results are displayed in an easy-to-understand format. For small teams, this avoids the need for a separate testing tool.

⚠ Watch out for

  • The free trial is only 30 days, and after that, pricing is relatively high compared to competitors. The basic plan starts at $24/month for up to 30,000 views, but if you have a high-traffic site (over 1 million views), costs escalate quickly to $199/month. Hotjar offers a free tier for small sites, and Microsoft Clarity is completely free, making Crazy Egg less attractive for budget-conscious startups.
  • The absence of a true free tier is a significant drawback. Unlike Hotjar (which has a limited free plan) or Clarity (free unlimited), Crazy Egg forces you to pay after the trial. This makes it less accessible for hobby sites or small side projects that still want basic heatmap data.
  • Advanced segmentation is limited. You can filter by traffic source, device, and a few other basic dimensions, but you cannot combine multiple conditions or create custom segments based on user behavior (e.g., users who added to cart but didn't purchase). This limits deep-dive analysis that experienced CROs often need.
  • Integration options are modest. While it integrates with Google Analytics, Shopify, WordPress, and a few others, it lacks native integrations with many major platforms like HubSpot, Marketo, or Segment. You'll need to use workarounds or third-party tools (like Zapier) for more complex setups, which can be a hassle.
  • The A/B testing feature is basic and lacks advanced statistical tools like sequential testing or Bayesian analysis. For a team that relies heavily on rigorous experimentation, this might feel insufficient, pushing them toward a dedicated testing tool.

🎯 Best for

Marketers and small product teams who want an affordable, easy-to-use visual analytics tool to improve landing page conversions.

🚫 Who should skip

Enterprise teams or advanced analytics users needing granular event tracking, custom metrics, or robust product analytics.

💰 Hidden costs

Upgrades required for higher monthly visitor limits; extra snapshots or historical data retention may also require higher-tier plans. Session recording storage limits can be restrictive on lower plans.

📚 Learning curve

Minimal. Installation takes about 5 minutes, and the dashboard is straightforward, so you can get actionable insights almost immediately.

🧑‍⚖️ Verdict

Crazy Egg is a solid choice for small to mid-sized businesses that want intuitive visual analytics without a steep learning curve. Its heatmaps and Confetti report are genuinely useful for conversion optimization. However, if you're on a tight budget or need advanced segmentation, look at alternativ

View Details

📊 Use Case Suitability

Higher score = better fit. Scores from editorial review.

Use CaseCloseCrazy Egg
High-volume cold calling for SMB sales teams95— Close's power dialer and native calling are purpose-built for reps making dozens
Managing multi-stage B2B sales pipelines88— Customizable pipelines, drag-and-drop deal stages, and activity tracking give sa
Automated email and SMS follow-up sequences82— Workflow automation can trigger personalized follow-ups based on call outcomes,
Sales coaching and performance monitoring75— Call recording, call coaching tools, and activity dashboards let managers review
Affiliate/partner program management via PartnerStack55— Close integrates with PartnerStack, but it is not an affiliate platform itself.
Landing Page Conversion Optimization—95 Crazy Egg's heatmaps and Overlay reports show exactly which elements users click
Understanding Scroll Depth on Long Content—90 Scrollmaps show how far visitors scroll down articles or product pages, helping
Session Replay for Usability Issues—85 Session recordings let you watch individual user sessions to spot navigation pro

🧭 Which One Should You Pick?

Choose Close if...

  • You are: Close is best for SMB sales teams that rely on high-volume phone outreach and need a simple, all-in-one CRM with built-i
  • 👍 Native calling with power dialer directly in the CRM, so no third-party telephony setup is needed.
  • 👍 Strong activity logging: emails, calls, and SMS are automatically tracked against the contact or lea
  • 👍 Flexible workflows for automating repetitive tasks like follow-up reminders and data enrichment.
  • 💰 Free tier available
  • ⚠ Trade-off: No permanent free tier; the trial period is only 14 days, which can be short for

Choose Crazy Egg if...

  • You are: Marketers and small product teams who want an affordable, easy-to-use visual analytics tool to improve landing page conv
  • 👍 Confetti report is a unique and powerful way to segment clicks by traffic source, which most heatmap
  • 👍 Heatmaps offer configurable sample sizes and confidence levels, so you can choose accuracy over spee
  • 👍 Includes both heatmaps and session recordings in one plan, so you don't need to purchase a separate
  • 💰 From $24/mo
  • ⚠ Trade-off: Not truly free; the 'free' price is just a 30-day trial and paid plans start at

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Is Close really free?

No. Close does not offer a permanent free plan; the listed 'Free' refers to a 14-day free trial. Paid plans start after the trial, with pricing based on features and team size.

Can I migrate data from another CRM into Close?

Yes, Close provides built-in CSV import and offers migration assistance from popular CRMs like HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive. Some historical data (like email threading) may need cleanup depending on the source.

🔗 More Marketing Comparisons

🔀 Explore Alternatives

🤖

AI Compare Buddy

Experimental

Let AI analyze features, pricing, and reviews to help you decide.

📧 Save this comparison

We'll email you a link to this comparison. No spam.